„Why did you have to say that?“
„Why? I just took the opposite opinion.“
„Yes. That’s what I mean. Why couldn’t you just affirm? What’s so important about taking the ‚opposing view‘? Why does everything have to be discussed? Why is it imperative that separation be created and brought into the light? So that one can ‚talk about it‘? So that it can be ‚discussed‘? So that one can ‚illuminate it from all sides‘? So that the mind simply has a reason to be involved, because it is so jealous when it is not involved? Is that why ‚the opposing opinion‘ must be compulsively taken, where it could also simply be affirmed?“